Canadian Senate Recognized the Wrongs of Medical Coercion in June 2021
Covid-19 Vaccine Harmfulness Entering the Mainstream News and Politics
Medical Coercion in Canada
In June 2021, the Canadian Senate released part I of a report titled “Forced and Coerced Sterilization of Persons in Canada”. The following quotes are from that report.
p. 11: “According to the international nongovernmental organization Human Rights Watch, “[f]orced sterilization occurs when a person is sterilized after expressly refusing the procedure, without… knowledge or is not given an opportunity to provide consent.”1 An express refusal can include a verbal and/or a non-verbal statement or movement of pulling away. Amnesty International explains that “[s]terilization under coercion is when people give their consent to be sterilized, but on the basis of incorrect information or other coercive tactics such as intimidation, or that conditions are attached to sterilization, such as financial incentives or access to health services.”2
P. 13 “A United Nations interagency statement noted that forced and coerced sterilization has been recognized by human rights bodies as “a violation of the right to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”3 as enumerated in Article 1 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”4
Covid vaccination mandate compliance as a condition to remain employed or obtain employment, is a condition attached to covid vaccination. It is self-evident that covid vaccination mandates are medical coercion.
p. 13: “Reproductive rights are protected under domestic and international human rights frameworks. In Canada, they are considered part of the right to security of the person as guaranteed by section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter). Security of the person includes a person’s right to control their own body and it also prevents the state from interfering with personal autonomy, which includes the imposition of “unwanted medical treatment.”5 Professional regulating bodies in all jurisdictions in Canada have policies for medical professionals on obtaining free and informed consent to medical intervention.6 Some of these policies require that consent be free from coercion; however, “further efforts to improve the interactions between patients and providers on informed consent is required.”7”
Criminal-code.ca explains the crime of extortion:
“Section 346(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines extortion as inducing a person, through threats, accusations, menaces or violence, to do or cause something to be done with the intention of obtaining anything.”
“Section 346(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada outlines the criminal offence of extortion in Canadian criminal law. It defines extortion as the act of inducing or attempting to induce a person to do something or cause something to be done by making threats, accusations, menaces, or using violence, without reasonable justification or excuse and with the intent to obtain anything.”
The Canadian government menaced its entire population with a fake pandemic to obtain mass vaccination without a reasonable justification. I discussed the lack of reasonable justification from an economic standpoint in the Coercive Vaccine Mandates Were Predicated on Economic False Pretences post.
Canada Recognized That Forced and Coerced Sterilization is a Crime
In July 2022, the Canadian Senate released part II of a report titled “Forced and Coerced Sterilization of Persons in Canada – Part II”. The following quotes are from that report.
P. 26 “Canada provided follow-up information in response to the UN Committee against Torture’s observations and recommendations. Canada’s response noted that forced or coerced sterilization is a crime in Canada, constituting an offence under one or more sections of the Criminal Code, such as sections 265 (assault), 267 (assault causing bodily harm) and 268 (aggravated assault), and that in addition, all provinces and territories have legislation requiring consent for medical care and treatment. Canada’s response further noted that the federal government, through the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, is committed to investigating reported allegations and treating those who report such crimes in a respectful manner.8”
The Canadian Senate report on forced and coerced sterilization part II issues this recommendation:
P.32 “Recommendation 4 - That the Government of Canada issue a formal apology on behalf of all Canadians to all persons who have been subjected to forced and coerced sterilization in Canada.”
Canadian Health Minister Admitted to the Wrongs of Medical Coercion in a March 2023 Response Letter
Although that I agree with the conclusions and sentiment of the Senate reports, those reports were not motivated by any sense of morals or ethics. They were motivated by the wokeism of the Trudeau government. The Trudeau government shot itself in the foot by pursuing the issue of forced and coerced sterilization. By writing up this report, the Canadian government defined and admitted the fact of medical coercion in Canada.
Vaccination is a medical treatment/intervention/procedure just like sterilization. The arguments against forced and coerced sterilization also apply to coerced vaccination. The report on Forced and Coerced Sterilization of Persons in Canada also apply to any medical treatment, vaccination included.
The senate has inadvertently presented a noose to the Liberal-NDP axis of evil.
Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos and Minister of Indigenous Services Patty Hajdu, in their March 2023 response letter to the Senate, admitted on behalf of the government that forced and coerced sterilization is:
immoral, ethically wrong, and illegal without informed consent.
a serious violation of human rights and medical ethics, and
a prosecutable offence under existing Criminal Code.
Excerpt from the ministers’ response:
The ministers’ admission stuck the governments’ heads into that noose.
All that’s needed now is for the RCMP and/or the Canadian Army to do its job. What will it take for that to happen?
Covid-19 Vaccination Harmfulness Entering the Overton Window: Going Mainstream
Throughout the world we read news of countries attempting to criminalize and suppress vaccine harmfulness from entering the public discourse. These censorship attempts are futile and have failed. The inevitable acceptance by a majority of the harmfulness of covid-19 vaccination is nearing and is entering politics around the world.
The Overton Window is “the range of opinion positions which are acceptable to the mainstream population at a given time. It is also known as the acceptable window of discourse.”9 In politics this translate into what’s platform-able, into what a political party can run on.
The criminality of the covid-19 vaccination mandates is inevitably crawling itself from under the carpet as the harmfulness of the covid shots goes mainstream. Looking at the developments of the media landscape of our American neighbors, in the Rapid Reversal of Public Opinion on Covid-19 Vaccine Safety post, I extrapolated from surveys that 50% of Americans will have that opinion by November 2024. In the coming months, covid vaccination harmfulness will become political capital. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaxxer, is running for the US presidency and is gaining in popularity. Oups…
What caused the first “Forced and Coerced Sterilization of Persons in Canada” senate report was a July 2017 Saskatchewan Regional Health Authority report10 bringing awareness to the plight of indigenous women in Canada. The report documented the experiences of 16 women, most of whom reported being coercively sterilized between 2005 and 2010.
The National Citizens Inquiry
In Canada, in 2023, we had the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) which heard more than 300 testimonies.
A massive report of 5000+ pages was produced explaining in great details a focused campaign of propaganda and false information produced by government and their partners in media and big business to falsely promote COVID-19 as a terrifying pandemic.
I believe the NCI report is perfectly positioned to cause the provincial and the federal governments to recognize and admit their crimes; They have no choice with covid-19 vaccination harmfulness going mainstream.
Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of the Canadian Hate Science
An important enabler of the governments propaganda and disinformation is a fraudulent study authored by David Fisman, Afia Amoako and Ashleigh R. Tuite. This is explained in great detail in the book: “Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of the Canadian Hate Science”
P. 184 – Chapter 14 The Takeaway: “David Fisman, Afia Amoako and Ashleigh R. Tuite concocted a faux scientific model to fabricate data that showed the unvaccinated constitute a disproportionate risk to society, a trend contrary to reality, then proceeded to state the fabricated results as fact in order to inform government policy that defrauds millions of Canadians of basic rights and freedoms.”11
Fisman’s Fraud explains how the fraudulent study of Fisman was used by governments to circumvent Charter Protections. Fisman’s Fraud also explains how the Canadian legal system was captured. In September 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada was compromised by imposing its own vaccine mandate on its staff, including all nine judges.12 How could the Supreme Court objectively entertain a constitutional challenge against the very measure it adopted. This is top-bottom corruption of the courts.
Former Minister of Justice Lametti, who recently resigned immediately after his invocation of emergencies measures was ruled illegal and unconstitutional, was also involved in the corruption and capture of the Supreme Court of Canada. Lametti and Chief Justice Richard Wagner co-chaired the Action Committee on Court Operations in Response to COVID-19. David Eby, current Premier of BC, is also a member of that Action Committee.
“The Action Committee was informed by government representatives, not an independent, objective body. The courts readily adopted controversial policies that millions of citizens across the country have rejected as violating the supreme law of Canada.”13
The Key Role of Courts Taking Judicial Notice
Canadian courts took judicial notice that the covid vaccines were safe and effective.
“Judicial notice means that the court accepts a fact without proof. It is supposed to apply to facts that are clearly uncontroversial or beyond reasonable dispute”14 In M.M. v. W.A.K., 2022 ONSC 4580 Superior Court Justice J. Christopher Corkery did not take judicial notice of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Corkery expressed concerns in taking judicial notice that the government is always right:
“b. What about the Residential School system? For decades the government assured us that taking Indigenous children away – and being wilfully blind to their abuse – was the right thing to do. We’re still finding children’s bodies.
c. How about sterilizing Eskimo women? The same thing. The government knew best.
d. Japanese and Chinese internment camps during World War Two? The government told us it was an emergency and had to be done. Emergencies can be used by governments to justify a lot of things that later turn out to be wrong.
e. Few people remember Thalidomide. It was an experimental drug approved by Canada and countries throughout the world in the late 1950’s. It was supposed to treat cancer and some skin conditions. Instead it caused thousands of birth defects and dead babies before it was withdrawn from the market. But for a period of time government experts said it was perfectly safe.”15
“The science relating to COVID-19 is developing. The “facts” are changing: [68] As well, how can you take judicial notice of a moving target?”16
This is why court cases against the covid vaccine have failed and how the courts have been captured. It’s the result of abuse of powers.
Circling back to the government’s admission that forced and coerced sterilization (and all medical treatments) is a human rights abuse and criminal offense, the recent peer-reviewed article COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign authored by Jessica Rose, Steve Kirsch, Peter McCollough and others definitely establishes that a controversy on the covid-19 vaccine does exists and that there’s no consensus on its safety.
As the vaccine harmfulness becomes a mainstream accepted fact, all court cases that took judicial notice of the vaccine safety and efficacy will have to be revisited.
How Can Covid-19 Vaccine Harmfulness Enter Politics?
It’s one thing for politicians to admit it, but then what next? Obviously, harm has been done, there’s massive damages. How can political oppositions deliver a solution?
The difference between the covid pandemic and a conventional war is that we didn’t have identifiable armies damaging infrastructure using explosives. But, just like a conventional war, the covid pandemic and its government responses did cause massive loss of life, injured people, and economic losses.
The opportunity for political oppositions is to declare the covid pandemic and its government responses a non-conventional war-like event whereas the role of armies causing loss of life, injuries and economic damages is ascribed to the existing web of malfeasance and corruption that the swamp is.
Everybody across the political spectrum (right to left) can rally behind anti-corruption measures, it’s the perfect unifying theme for divided societies and against polarizing ideologies.
After a war, no country is ever able to compensate its population losses using peace time legal processes. Thus, moving forward, it is economically impossible to compensate an entire population with monetary damages because that would simply bankrupt the country.
Fantasizing about vengeance or punishment might feel right, but it’s not a proper motive for a response to a primarily spiritual conflict. If you want vengeance, your ego is in control and that puts you on the wrong side of a spiritual war.
Having a Nuremberg 2.0 won’t help either because the first Nuremberg clearly didn’t prevent or deter what happened in the last four years. I’m not saying to forgive or give an amnesty to those involved in covid crimes. Far from that, prosecutions must happen. But, moving forward, the primary goal is not vengeance, it’s the restoration and protection of justice and prosperity for current and future generations.
Having a Nuremberg 2.0 won’t help either because the first Nuremberg clearly didn’t prevent or deter what happened in the last four years. I’m not saying to forgive or give an amnesty to those involved in covid crimes. Far from that, prosecutions must happen. But the primary goal is not vengeance, it’s the restoration and protection of justice and prosperity for current and future generations.
Societal Solutions
What can be done by political oppositions is to run and gain power on a platform that recognizes the damages of the government’s response to the pandemic and offers to the population:
sweeping anti-corruption measures,
the dissolution of corrupt government agencies,
the firing and prosecution of corrupt bureaucrats,
automatic public disclosure of government processes, registrable government data,
etc.
One very effective anti-corruption measure to install is a whistleblower program covering all taxing authorities cash inflows (taxation income and fees) and outflows (transfers and expenses). Such a program would offer a 10% to 30% monetary reward on tips leading to successful recoveries or avoided public funds losses from corrupt activities.
Such a whistleblower program would immediately recruit all honest public servants by replacing their incentive to remain silent with a tangible reward. This will drain the swamp at ALL levels and fast.
On the movie set Rust, Hollywood actor Alec Baldwin was supposed to shoot blanks, instead he shot live rounds, killed someone and is now on trial for involuntary manslaughter.17 Likewise, the covid-19 vaccine is to the world swamp what the loaded gun given to Alec Baldwin was on the Rust movie set. The covid-19 vaccine was given to corrupt world governments as a safe and effective pandemic response, it wasn’t. The world swamp is thus caught by the world governments’ covid-19 vaccine response to the covid pandemic.
Human Rights Watch, Sterilization of Women and Girls with Disabilities: A Briefing Paper, 10 November 2011
Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights [RIDR], Briefs, Amnesty International Submission to Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights Study on Sterilization Without Consent, submitted by Amnesty International, 5 April 2019
World Health Organization et al., Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization: An interagency statement, 2014, p. 1.
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, General Assembly resolution 39/46, December 1984.
Department of Justice, Section 7 – Life, liberty and security of the person, citing R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30 at p. 56; Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 at para. 62; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519; Blencoe v. British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307 at para. 55; C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 at paras. 100-102.
See for example: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Policy Statement #3-15 - Consent to Treatment.
RIDR, Evidence, 15 May 2019 (Abby Hoffman, Assistant Deputy Minister, Policy Branch, Health Canada).
UN Committee against Torture, Information received from Canada on follow-up to the concluding observations on its seventh periodic report, 16 April 2020
Dr. Yvonne Boyer and Dr. Judith Bartlett, External Review: Tubal Ligation in the Saskatoon Health Region: The Lived Experience of Aboriginal Women, 22 July 2017.
P. 184 – Chapter 14 – The Takeaway - Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science
P. 163 – Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science “prior to the federal vaccine mandate, the Supreme Court of Canada imposed its own COVID-19 vaccination mandate for in-court staff, as directed by Chief Justice Richard Wagner. The top court also announced that all nine of its judges were fully vaccinated.”
Very well written and informative. I still think you are a bit too optimistic re the masses waking up in Canada.Thanks from a fellow BC er.
Another excellent piece. We linked to it in Issue 14 as well - page 3 https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/csn-week-14-vol-1-issue-14