With the covid-19 vaccine rollout, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) published surveys of various proclaimed false “health misinformation” statements, and it measured what percentage of Americans believes them as definitely, or probably true. KFF is essentially measuring covid narrative dissidence (wrong-think or thought crimes). I think KFF or its funding sources1, like the Gates Foundation, Google, Twitter, Walgreens pharmacies, probably know those statements are true, but to pass the online censorship, KFF proclaimed them as false.
The following three statements express the belief in covid vaccine harmfulness of the general public which has been measured by KFF surveys.234
The above statements are not identical but are measuring ideas that are closely related. Using the line from high school Y = m * X + b, I calculated a slope “m” and an intercept “b” in Excel and extrapolated the date when 50% and 60% of the US population will have the belief that covid vaccines are harmful. This is a mere back-of-the-envelop calculation to drive the point that public opinion on vaccine harmfulness is gaining support.
The trajectory of public opinion on covid-19 vaccine harmfulness is clear and by the end 2024, right on time for the US presidential election, a majority of the public will have adopted the belief that covid-19 vaccines are harmful and by the end of 2025 it will be shared by a strong majority of the US population (60%) if the trend continues. When that happens, the legal systems will start working again and its corruption will be exposed and made evident for all to see. This will pull the stopper of the World Swamp, it’ll drain.
This level of skepticism is independently confirmed by a Rasmussen Report dated January 2nd, 2023, that surveyed 1000 American Adults between December 28-30, 2022, finding that 28% believed it “Very Likely” that Covid-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, and 21% believe that to be “Somewhat Likely”. That’s 49% in total believing in harmfulness of the Covid-19 vaccines.56
In its Oct 14-24, 2021, survey, KKF found that 14% believe the proclaimed false statement: “Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.”. In its May 23-June 12, 2023, survey, KFF found that 31% believe the proclaimed false statement: “Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19.”. Within two years the public opinion grew favorable to ivermectin.
The growing favorable public opinion for Ivermectin as an effective treatment and decreasing favorable public opinion of covid vaccines safety is proof that the government propaganda and censorship is failing. Within the next year, major political parties, across the world, at various level of government, will increasingly campaign on the covid vaccine harmfulness, for example, Robert F. Kennedy.7
In British Columbia, healthcare workers are rapidly losing confidence in vaccines, from 2019 to 2022 the influenza vaccination rate among healthcare workers plummeted to 60% from 78% in just three years.89
KFF’s Funding Sources or Its Directors Are Oddly Interested in Guns since Covid Vaccination Started
In the May 23-June12, 2023, survey, KFF found that 43% believed the proclaimed false statement: “Most gun homicides in the United States are gang-related.”.10 This closely matches with the 2021 statistics in Canada that measured Canadian gang-related homicides at 46%. From a Canadian standpoint, the Americans surveyed by KFF are correct in their belief.
Since KFF is a Gates Foundation funded, self-proclaimed independent source for health policy research, polling, and news, I found it odd that it would measure a belief about guns which isn’t a health issue, it’s a public safety issue. I used their website search box for “gun violence” tagged posts. KFF website returned 17 results, 14 of which are dated after the start of the covid vaccinations.
As KFF is tracking the public opinion on covid vaccination safety, it coincidently became interested in gun issues which are outside its historical sandbox of healthcare issues. This is fear.
The Mainstream Media is Turning and Will Stop Protecting “Safe and Effective” Narrative
I think that the mainstream medias are turning on government narratives. This is something that has started in the US and is advancing. MSN published that CNN has allowed counter narratives to mask efficacy to be aired.11 This indicates that the US mainstream is gearing to abandon those false narrative as their viewership is plummeting because of their blatant propagandist activities.
This explains Trudeau’s government acceleration of its censorship of Canadian media12 with bill C-18 becoming effective on December 19th, 2023, instead of 2025.13
I think the Canadian government fears, despite its approximate 70% funding of the CBC14, that the CBC will turn on them. The CBC is forced to turn because their ratings are plummeting.1516 Trudeau can’t defund the CBC because that would be endorsing Poilievre and the Conservatives.17
This is going to backfire and accelerate the general public’s abandonment of government propaganda as the public will migrate out of Big Tech to obtain their news. The acceleration of C-18 is opening the gates of the mainstream information sandbox. Right outside that sandbox there are the Substacks of Dr. William Makis MD, Steve Kirsch, Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter, Jessica Rose, etc. The public will join a fringe minority with unacceptable views, Trudeau’s cornered.
If your data is even close to being correct, then you can be assured the next pandemic will happen before that 50% threshold is crossed.